Rob Stallard surveys the exploits of one of Britain's greatest heroes in China (China Eye magazine (2008)).

China and UK

Chinese Gordon

China and UK

When I heard the phrase 'Chinese Gordon' I wondered, surely, our Prime Minister could not have turned into a Sinophile?

The explanation became more intriguing at every turn. The 'Gordon' in question was the all-British hero I knew as 'Gordon of Khartoum'. So why the Chinese sobriquet and why did he have amongst his possessions the throne of the Chinese Emperor and a gold medal struck especially in his honour by order of the Emperor?

If you go back one hundred years and run the BBC's '100 Great Britons' poll General Charles Gordon would head the list. Yet, in the 2002 BBC poll he does not figure at all despite the fact that he is meant to epitomise all that was 'good' and 'heroic' about the British Empire. Similarly if you take a look in Chinese history books you will see Gordon mentioned as a mere footnote. Certainly something must have changed, as this man single-handedly brought down a British government and decided the fate of the Qing dynasty in China. This collective memory loss has elements of British shame of Imperial misrule and, to Chinese eyes foreign humiliation. The real story is a challenge to these pre-conceptions.

Clash of empires

Chinese Gordon

In the mid-nineteenth century Britain was starting to think of itself as an Empire rather than just an international hub of ever-burgeoning free trade. Up until the governments of Disraeli, Britain was a somewhat reluctant military power. The British Empire's period of growth (1840-1900) was symmetrically matched by the decline of the Qing Empire. Indeed one more striking parallel is that Queen and Empress Victoria ruled Britain 1837-1901 while Dowager Empress Cixi effectively ruled China 1861-1908.

It is not possible to cover this time period without mentioning the 'Opium Wars' between Britain and China 1839-1842 and 1856-60. Much has still to be written on this delicate topic. At the time many in Britain took the view that it was all to do with the East India Company and not the government. People could conveniently hide behind this purely 'commercial' arrangement. If China was to follow the model of India then great fortunes were there to be made. Others saw it differently. None less than William Gladstone was 'in dread of the judgement of God upon England for our national iniquity towards China'. In one of his first great Commons speeches (1840) he spoke passionately against the enterprise:

“I do not know how it can be urged as a crime against the Chinese that they refused obedience to their laws whilst residing in their own country. I am not competent to judge how long this war may last, nor how protracted may be its operations, but this I can say, that a war more unjust in its origin, a war more calculated in its progress to cover this country with disgrace, I do not know and I have not heard of.”

It was at the tail end of the 2nd Opium War in 1860 that Captain Gordon at the age of 27 first set foot in China. Charles Edward Gordon was the son of a Major General, and it was soon clear that's career was to follow those of his father into the Army. However his taciturn character showed through even at Sandhurst and he had to settle for a post with the Royal Engineers rather than the Royal Artillery regiment. After brief service at the Crimea, serving with conspicuous gallantry, he was present at the looting and burning of the Old Summer Palace (Yuónmíng Yuón), near Beijing - surely a low point in Anglo-Chinese relations. The chief culprit seems to be Lord Elgin, High Commissioner to China, whose father had looted Greece of its treasures, had his eyes on richer prizes in China. In Lytton Strachey's words 'an act by which Lord Elgin, in the name of European civilisation, took vengeance upon the barbarism of the East'. Gordon sent back to England one of the Emperor's thrones, which was his share of the loot.

As if the Opium Wars were not sufficiently destabilising, China was also embroiled with the Taiping rebellion (1850-1864). The rebellion was a strange mixture of peasant revolt; nationalist feeling against Manchu rule and contorted Christianity. In Guangzhou, Hong Xiuquan, a lowly schoolteacher built an empire on revolutionary principles forbidding the wearing of the queue, foot-binding, prostitution, opium but promoting land reform (i.e. kicking out the landlords) and equal rights for women. A mystical experience during a probable dose of smallpox made him believe himself to be Jesus's younger brother. To the masses it was the rebellion against Manchu rule and land reform that appealed. For eleven years most of southern China was in his control from the Taiping capital at Nanjing. This was one of the worst Civil Wars in human history with 20 million casualties. At one stage it looked as though the rebels might win.

To the Western powers, the Taiping rebellion provided something of a quandary. Here was a 'Christian', reforming movement that already controlled southern China, should they support it? Alternatively should they support the faltering Qing dynasty that they knew would accede to any demand given sufficient pressure? It was not a clear-cut decision. Western mercenaries were employed on both sides. Indeed Henry Burgevine, an American adventurer, managed to earn his money by working first for the Qing, and when dismissed by them, their enemies the Taiping rebels.

Lord Elgin was once again involved at a pivotal moment when he sailed up the Yangtse in a gunboat. His attitude is evident from the diary entry for 20th November 1858.

“It is determined therefore that tomorrow we shall set to work and demolish some of the forts that have insulted us [fired on his boats] I hope the Rebels will make some communication, and enable us to explain that we mean them no harm; but it is impossible to anticipate what these stupid Chinamen will do.”

British gunboat diplomacy meant destroy first and then explain afterwards that that there was no ill intent. Meanwhile Hong, the rebel leader, was eager for a meeting, and sent a curious message to his fellow Christian:

“Foreign younger brother from the Western Sea, heed my royal proclamation:
Let us together serve God and our Elder Brother [Jesus] and destroy the hateful insects [Qing empire]. All that happens on Earth is controlled by God, our Elder Brother, and myself.
My brother, join us joyfully, and earn incalculable rewards.”

It is difficult to see what common ground two such people could find, and the invitation was not taken up. It was as an opportunity for diplomacy that might have led to a very different course of history.

Defender of Shanghai

What sealed the allegiance of the British forces was the threat of the rebels to Shanghai. Shanghai was a flourishing port now open to foreigners, by 1852 it handled half of the trade between Britain and China. The Taipings sought to capture it. After witnessing the end of the Opium War Captain Gordon had toured China. He was then given the job (as a Royal Engineer) of building the defences of the city. Of course this really meant defending the foreign enclaves within the city rather than just the city itself.

Shanghai had a motley crew of mainly Chinese conscripts and mercenaries called the 'Ever Victorious Army' (cháng shèng jun) although it rarely if ever lived up to its name. Initially led by the American Frederick Ward until his death in action in 1862, the Chinese Governor Li Hongzhang then turned to Burgevine, who was found to be untrustworthy and finally to Captain Gordon on the recommendation of the British.

It was at this time that Shanghai was receiving a deluge of refugees from the areas controlled by the Taiping. Hong's land reforms were not working, he had been unable to deliver his promises and the ordinary people had turned against him. The city boundaries were guarded and blocked to all non-residents, but even so people saw no choice but to seek food and sanctuary in the city. Hardened military men such as General Sir Garnet Wolseley found the condition of the refugees quite appalling:

“In all such places as we had an opportunity of visiting the distress and misery of the inhabitants were beyond description. Large families were crowded together into low, small tent-shaped wigwams, constructed of reeds, through the thin sides of which the cold wind whistled at every blast from the biting north. The denizens were clothed in rags of the most loathsome kind, and huddled together for the sake of warmth. The old looked cast down and unable to work from weakness, whilst that eager expression peculiar to starvation, never to be forgotten by those who have witnessed it, was visible upon the emaciated features of the little children.”

In 1863, Gordon just turned thirty years old, was given the rank of General, focused his energies on the defence of the City and then took on the fight against the rebels. A driven man, who like Hong had had a religious experience that gave him an unbending Christian duty to all less fortunate than himself. Gordon was just the person that was needed to remodel the Army. Military discipline of the firmest kind was instilled into his soldiers, they were to be paid a salary in place of a share of the pillage. They were issued with uniforms. In the early days of his strict regime the whole Army mutinied against the changes he had instituted, but with summary execution for desertion and selfless leadership he gradually won them over.

To the Governor Li Hongzhang, later to be one of the key players at the Qing court in Beijing, Gordon was a revelation:

“It is a direct blessing from Heaven, the coming of this British Gordon. ... He is superior in manner and bearing to any of the foreigners whom I have come into contact with, and does not show outwardly that conceit which makes most of them repugnant in my sight.”

Men like Li Hongzhang had come into contact with only haughty, aristocratic diplomats of the Lord Elgin mould or merchant adventurers whose sole selfish motive was exploitation. Li even compared him favourably to his fellow General Zeng Guofan, which must have been a first in Anglo-Chinese relations:

“What an elixir for a heavy heart - to see this splendid Englishman fight! ... If there is anything that I admire nearly as much as the superb scholarship of Zeng Guofan, it is the military qualities of this fine officer. He is a glorious fellow!”

Gordon proved incorruptible, and that began to irritate Governor Li who used money to get his way out of almost any difficulty. His view became more qualified.

“With his many faults, his pride, his temper, and his never-ending demand for money - but he is a noble man, and in spite of all I have said to him or about him, I will ever think most highly of him. ... He is an honest man, but difficult to get on with.”

Gordon was, of course, after money not for himself but to pay his troops and buy military equipment. It was not just high moral fibre that made Gordon stand out, he knew how best to fight a campaign. He planned expeditions using every benefit that the countryside could afford him. He went on dangerous mapping sorties to reconnoitre enemy territory. He devised his own form of gunboat to navigate the shallow creeks of the Yangzi. Like the Duke of Wellington, Gordon was a highly professional soldier. Looking after his troops he epitomises the hardworking, selfless military life. Meticulous and daring he inspired idolatry among his men.

Most characteristically, he led the troops from the front, unarmed, except for his swagger stick, treating with disdain the bullets that flew around him. Such brave (or stupid) behaviour was bound to cause some degree of veneration, and it is said that the Taiping rebels were ordered not to shoot at the faintly smiling Englishman leading their enemies. The 'Ever Victorious Army' now lived up to its name, and the rebels were repeatedly beaten back towards Nanjing.

Li Hongzhang

When Gordon negotiated the surrender of Suzhou he agreed that the rebel leaders would go unharmed. But when he discovered that they had in fact been summarily beheaded he was furious, Gordon searched everywhere for Li Hongzhang with a loaded pistol in his hand. Li tried to placate him with money and a medal, but that of course made matters worse, Gordon resigned his command. In one of the most bizarre of scenes to contemplate, a high-ranking Chinese leader was seeking to escape the clutches of a foreigner furious because Gordon's own enemies had been killed. Li eventually successfully pleaded with him to complete the task for the sake of the Chinese people and Gordon resumed his duties. More military successes followed.

When offered the command, Gordon had said he would finish the 'business' in eighteen months. He was true to his word. He left the inevitable final capture of Nanjing to Zeng and Li to complete. The job was done and the Qing Emperor was enormously grateful. Gordon was sent heaps of gold in bowls carried by the emperor's men. Believing this was some sort of bribe he sent them away but only after giving the bearers a flogging for the perceived insult he had received. Such was the empire's wish to reward that he was then given gifts he would accept: the highest possible military title of field marshal and the imperial yellow jacket (Huang Ma Gua) with a peacock feather. A special heavy gold medal was struck by imperial decree and presented to him.

On 10th May 1864 he wrote to his mother: "I shall leave China as poor as I entered it, but with the knowledge that through my weak instrumentality upwards of eighty to one hundred thousand lives have been spared. I want no further satisfaction than this."

On return to England he was fêted by the British Press who had portrayed him as a hero and 'Chinese Gordon' but his distaste for 'show' meant he quickly retreated into a fairly squalid, lonely existence at Gravesend. Who could use someone like Gordon in a military role? He had shown himself as an independent fiery spirit who was no-one but his own master - under God's guidance. His charitable work was unstinting, even the Emperor's gold medal was defaced so he could send it as an anonymous donation to a charitable appeal. An action that Gordon later admitted was one of the hardest he ever had had to do. He took some short foreign appointments but never settled down.

Chinese Gordon

With his knowledge of China and close relations with leading Qing courtiers, Gordon was invited back to China in 1880 to aid the Qing in their negotiations with Russia. The Qing knew that the British feared expansion of Russian control in Afghanistan; Siberia and Mongolia. Using Gordon might prove a useful diplomatic manoeuvre. He was welcomed back to China by Li Hongzhang, so it is certainly not correct to think China did not truly appreciate his previous exploits.

Gordon was no cautious diplomat. He spoke his mind. He expected his brash, non-diplomatic words to be translated for the Russians. The translator remained silent, choosing not to translate an outburst. Gordon's fury at this caused the translator, visibly quaking, to spill his tea and left Gordon himself to translate the word himself by snatching a dictionary and pointing out the word 'idiocy' to the terrified audience of mandarins and diplomats. With such a powerful but loose cannon at his disposal Li won the day and so war with Russia was averted. Gordon set off travelling throughout China much to the concern of the British government. They must have wondered what diplomatic damage he might inadvertently do. So he was recalled, and went somewhat reluctantly back to Britain.

That was the end of 'Chinese Gordon' as far as travel in China. He slipped back into a quiet life in England, all but forgotten by the British people who had fêted him on his first triumphal return.

Even though these events are based partly on the diaries of the Chinese, Gordon's influence is now considered unimportant in Chinese history. The greatly admired Hunanese General Zeng Guofan 1811-1872 and Li Hongzhang 1823-1901 take the credit for the defeat of the Taiping rebels, but who can say what influence Gordon had on their choice of military training and tactics.

In the wider Chinese context, the Tongzhi restoration (1861-1874) sought some overdue reforms through the 'Self Strengthening Movement' to rejuvenate the Qing dynasty. This was considered not as a wholesale adoption of Western principles but rebuilding on sound Confucian doctrine: 'Western function and Chinese essence'. This included Zeng Guofen's use of European style military organisation to build his unit of 'Hunan Braves', it should be remembered that Zeng had worked with Gordon on the Shanghai defences. Mao Zedong revered Zeng Guofan and Mao's military campaign in Jiangxi against the Guomindang must surely have looked back to the exploits of Gordon.

Gordon's Murderer

When Gordon was invited by an Egyptian minister to take on the Governorship of the Sudan, this was just the sort of impossible job that Gordon relished. Sudan was prey to the slave trade via Egypt and the Ottoman Empire. He, characteristically, volunteered to take only a fifth of the salary he was offered. One of his first tasks (1874) was to put down a revolt in Darfur Province (how sad it is that some things were never quite resolved). In typical selfless style he mounted a camel, rode alone across 85 miles of blazing desert direct to the enemy camp. His commanding presence and single-mindedness caused the whole rebel host to obey his command to disband and so Gordon returned triumphantly to Khartoum without having fired a shot.

He then toiled to end the slave trade in the Sudan but his Egyptian masters sought its continuance, and so after several hard fought attempts at reform he resigned and returned to Britain, Egypt had no use for this honest but peculiar Englishman.

Some years later in 1881 the position in the Sudan became critical. An Islamist extremist Muhammad Ahmed 'The Mad Madhi' led a rebellion and the Egyptian rulers were seeking an honourable withdrawal from the onslaught. Britain, together with France, by then effectively ruled Egypt so the decision was a tricky one. To withdraw and leave the Sudanese people to their fate or should they become involved militarily in their defence? Gladstone's Liberal party government was split on the issue. The Prime Minister hoped to hold his party together by taking a middle line of minimal involvement.

For some reason that still remains unclear, the Press and then the public turned to the forgotten Gordon as the one person whose knowledge and experience of the Sudan might save the day. Gladstone's government apparently agreed, although this was later denied. Gladstone's strong Christian faith and morals were somewhat in tune with that of Gordon's, but Gladstone sought compromise and negotiation where Gordon found confrontation and direct action.

Gordon arrived at Khartoum in 1884 and found an impossible situation. His clear orders were to withdraw the Egyptian and British personnel back to Egypt. True to character, he refused to leave the native Sudanese to their likely massacre at the hands of the Madhi's men. He built up defences and used the British Press to drum up support for a military contingent to aid him. He astonished his troops by visiting the camp of the 'Mad Madhi' in disguise. Gladstone and his government dithered, since they did not want to get embroiled in war in Africa in a land with no perceived strategic or economic value.

The familiar heroic scene is now set, as anyone who has seen Charlton Heston's portrayal in the film 'Khartoum' will recollect. General Gordon surveys the Nile desperately waiting for a sighting of General Wolesley's relief force on the Nile. It arrives three days late. Gordon's body is never found in the ruin of Khartoum. The determination of Gordon to hang on at Khartoum and do his duty by the Sudanese people leads to not just his heroic death but to a revision to the concept of 'British Empire'.

So it was that Prime Minister Gladstone was widely portrayed, with some justification, as Gordon's murderer. In the Press 'The Spectator' thundered "'a grave misfortune has fallen on civilization". Amongst the strongest critics was Queen Victoria who deliberately sent Gladstone an un-encoded telegram so that all should know her displeasure "These News from Khartoum are frightful and to think that all this might have been prevented and many precious lives saved by earlier action is too fearful".

Gladstone's reply to her is a master class in diplomatic belittlement.

“Mr Gladstone does not presume to estimate the means of judgement possessed by Your Majesty, but so far as his information and recollection go, he is not altogether able to follow the conclusion which Your Majesty has pleased thus to announce.”

Gladstone limped on for another four months in command of a mortally wounded government. Disraeli's view of an Empire spreading Enlightenment across the globe won the upper hand and jingoistic supporters sought to emulate Gordon's heroism.


For the next fifty years Gordon was revered as a 'Christian martyr' and a 'soldier for enlightenment'. Dotted over the Empire, schools and towns were named in his honour. Lytton Strachey's 'warts and all' biography was the first to reveal the troubled spirit that underlay the overly heroic image. His dramatic end at Khartoum was hi-jacked for those whose political aims promoted Imperial conquest. But judging by his life, Gordon was no conquering nationalist, he did not conquer a single square mile of land for the Queen, and chiefly worked for foreign governments and not the British Army. Now that the Imperial era is viewed with regret and distaste, Gordon's exploits which have for so long been associated with Empire no longer receive any attention.

In China, Gordon is dismissed as yet another foreign mercenary who exploited the country's weakness at the time. But, surely all the people he came across must have revised their views of the 'foreign devils'. Here indeed was a fiery spirit but not one that exploited for monetary gain. The lessons of his success with the 'Ever Victorious Army' influenced all subsequent Chinese military campaigns, as European military tactics and weaponry were adopted.

Although Gordon's (and by proxy Britain's) efforts may have clinched victory in the Rebellion, the effect on Chinese politics was far-reaching. Trade with China became dominated by Britain, about two thirds of all foreign trade was between these two countries from 1860 to 1900 (the chief commodities opium and cotton). Li Hongzhang now had a modern army and a southern power base at his disposal, he was a match even for the Qing emperors, Li became the first of many warlords whose divisiveness invited foreign exploitation. After the 'Self Strengthening Movement' faltered, Dowager Empress Cixi turned back to more traditional Chinese solutions. Li Hongzhang negotiated with the Japanese but as these talks led on to the disastrous Sino-Japanese War and the fall of the Qing, history marks him out as a villain who failed to modernise quickly enough to meet the foreign threats.

On the monument to the defenders of Shanghai, Gordon is not even mentioned although the other foreigners who served are commemorated. I know of no monument to Gordon in China. Perhaps it is now time that this oversight is rectified. However, from what we know of his character he would surely been affronted by this idea and wish that any money for such a monument should instead be given to charity.


China: A concise history, M. Meyer
The Rise and Fall of the British Empire, Laurence James
China: a macro History, Ray Huang
God's Chinese Son, Jonathan Spence
Mao: a Life, Philip Short
Gladstone, Roy Jenkins
Gladstone 1804-1874, H.C.G. Matthew
Life of Gladstone, John Morley
The Story of General Gordon, Jeanie Lang
Eminent Victorians, Lytton Strachey
Chronicles of the Chinese Emperors, Ann Paludan
The Walled Kingdom, Witold Rodzinski

© Copyright Society for Anglo-Chinese Understanding (SACU) China Eye magazine Autumn 2008

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the view of SACU.
If you have any comments, updates or corrections please let us know via our Contact page.